Skip to content

Privacy Design®

[protecting people by good design, solid security, efficient processes and trusted services]

  • Best Practices
  • Guidance
  • DPA actions
  • News
  • Legal News
  • Privacy Risks
  • Incidents
  • Privacy Seals
  • Tools
  • About me
Posted on December 14, 2022December 14, 2022 by stefan

OCR Guidance on Use of Tracking Technologies Warrants Review of Website Tech

BakerHostetler commentary on recent HHS OCR guidance

https://www.bakerdatacounsel.com/information-governance-2/ocr-guidance-on-use-of-tracking-technologies-warrants-review-of-website-tech/

CategoriesNews

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious Paper: “Towards a Better Understanding of Identification, Pseudonymization, and Anonymization ” (2021, Bud P. Bruegger, ULD)
Next PostNext Microsoft offering free DPIA template for Microsoft 365 use

Recent Posts

  • CNIL publishes update to security guide
  • AEPD: Guidelines for processing activities that involve data communication between Public Administrations in the face of the risk of personal data breaches
  • Brazilian DPA Enacts Regulation on the Setting and Application of Administrative Penalties Under the Brazilian General Data Protection Law
  • Adversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations – Initial public draft of NIST AI 100-2 (2003 edition)
  • Spain: Catalan Data Protection Authority : Privacy by design and privacy by default: A guide for developers

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • March 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • February 2019
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • June 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • April 2016

    Categories

    • A29WP
    • ai
    • AI
    • anonymisation
    • artificial intelligence
    • audit
    • Balancing Test
    • Best Practices
    • big data
    • California
    • cloud
    • Code of Conduct
    • COE
    • contract gaps
    • Contract Template
    • cookies
    • cookies (ePR)
    • data breach
    • de-identification
    • de-identification
    • devices
    • DPA actions
    • DPIA helpers
    • DSAR
    • EDPB
    • EDPB-Art60-summaries
    • EDPS
    • ePR
    • Ethics
    • Guidance
    • HIPAA
    • Identification
    • Incidents
    • iot
    • Legal News
    • Legal overview
    • Legal texts
    • missing contractual controls
    • missing transparency
    • mobile app
    • mobile apps
    • News
    • Opinion
    • passwords
    • PET
    • policy gaps
    • policy gaps
    • Presentation
    • privacy notice
    • Privacy Risks
    • Privacy Seals
    • pseudonymisation
    • re-identification
    • Research
    • risk management gaps
    • scanner
    • security testing gaps
    • settlements
    • social media button
    • social media monitoring
    • Solution Development Lifecylce
    • Subject Access Requests
    • TOM
    • Tools
    • tracking
    • Uncategorized
    • unencrypted email
    • unsecured FTP server
    • USA
    • web site
    • Whitepaper

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    • Privacy Notice
    • Impressum
    • LinkedIn
    • eMail
    Privacy Notice Proudly powered by WordPress