The AEPD gives a non-comprehensive verification list for PrivacybyDesign audits in chapter VIII of its guidance (in English!)
https://www.aepd.es/sites/default/files/2020-10/guia-proteccion-datos-por-defecto-en.pdf
[protecting people by good design, solid security, efficient processes and trusted services]
The AEPD gives a non-comprehensive verification list for PrivacybyDesign audits in chapter VIII of its guidance (in English!)
https://www.aepd.es/sites/default/files/2020-10/guia-proteccion-datos-por-defecto-en.pdf
The DPA for France has published its Control Charter that explains how it conducts privacy inspections.
https://www.cnil.fr/fr/controles-de-la-cnil-une-charte-pour-tout-comprendre
Link to the actual document (in French)
https://www.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/atoms/files/cnil-charte_des_controles.pdf
.. in German
The DPA Saarland uses four questionnaires:
– interesting questions incl. on various concepts (data deletion, encryption, pseudonymization, risk evaluation/model, privacy management, ..)
https://fragdenstaat.de/anfrage/fragebogen-zur-prufung-des-datenschutzes-15/
Key points from the Accountability questionnaire (GDPR Art 5 (2))
We kindly ask you to answer the following questions in full and send the requested documents based on Art. 58 GDPR by January 31, 2019 at the latest.
Please send us a complete list of all domain names for your company.
Process description for data protection inspections / privacy inspections / audits.
In a first step, the DPA is gathering information and statements based on a questionnaire.
In addition, the DPA regularly requests the following information in an electronic format or on paper:
In order to assess compliance to GDPR and the effectiveness of the controls, the DPA regularly asks for
The Dutch Data Protection Authority (AP) sees no reason to initiate a more detailed investigation into possible violations of the GDPR by MRDM when storing medical data on a cloud platform. This concerns personal data originating from Dutch hospitals. Public questions have been asked about how the organization works. The privacy regulator has obtained information on this from MRDM. – MDRM is a third party IT Services provider processing patient data for Dutch hospitals.
MRDM in turn uses a sub-processor (apparently Google) for the storage of that personal data. This sub-processor is a cloud platform that is located outside the EU. The storage of data is done via the cloud. The ‘exploratory investigation’ of the AP related to that last step: the processing of patient data in the cloud.
As part of an explorative inquiry the DPA lookes at the storage, by MRDM’s sub-processor, of patient data in the cloud.
Apparently, the following have been reviewed
The personal data is stored in the Netherlands, the contracts with the cloud platform ensure that there is no international transfer of personal data to third countries outside the EEA. In addition, MRDM has informed the AP about how the data is protected.
The decision of the Dutch DPA not to investigate further might be seen as a sign that n that GDPR compliance can be achieved in respect of cloud-based processing of patient data.
DPA press release:
https://autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/nl/nieuws/ap-stelt-geen-onderzoek-naar-opslag-medische-gegevens-cloud
Blog post by BakerMcKenzie:
https://www.bakermckenzie.com/en/insight/publications/2019/11/draft-eprivacy-regulation-rejected
Media article:
https://www.agconnect.nl/artikel/medische-data-google-cloud-krijgt-geen-avg-onderzoek
.. without informing the users..
https://www.eldiario.es/tecnologia/Agencia-Proteccion-Datos-Liga-microfono_0_908859408.htm
incl. completed online inspection of 172 wordpress web sites planned, e.g. inspections around data deletion in SAP, questionnaires, detailed expectations on controls, ..
v2.0 August 2014
https://www.dataprotection.ie/docimages/documents/GuidetoAuditProcessAug2014.pdf
“This guidance was originally published in 2009. This revised version has been updated to take account of legislative developments and to reflect any changes in the approach of the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner to the audit process. The guidance is designed to assist organisations selected for audit by the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner. It is hoped that
this resource will provide organisations holding personal data with a simple and clear basis to conduct a self-assessment of their compliance with their obligations under Irish Data Protection Law”